I am continuing my search for information. As I read through the militaria forums, I constantly find myself reading posts and marveling at others' collections as well as noting the many differences in how collectors stow and display their items. Many of them have better collections than many museums I have been to! The best part about reading on the forums is that the information is 1.) up to date, 2.) collaborations--views/methods are presented, tested, analyzed, tested, and replicated for reputable and measurable results, and 3.) the topic is military artifacts, not generally antiques or collectibles that can encompass anything from pocket watches to roll-top desks. While most collectors agree on a set of basic commandments for preservation, artifacts come in all stages of disintegration (from ground-dug to carefully preserved) and require a range of treatments.
The requirements for treatments vary according to a collector's standards. Some wish to return every object to the state in which it was issued/used (like new...such as cleaning cloth, scrubbing away old rust, buffing patina), while others wish to display articles "as found" or with the wear present to testify that the items have "been there." For instance, some collectors apply Pecard's or Saddle Soap to leather items such as helmet liners to keep them from drying out and falling apart--any treatment causes the leather to darken, thus changing the originality of the helmet. Some consider this preservation, while others may place lesser value on a "messed with" item. It appears a delicate balance between
conservation and
treatment.
I have felt most comfortable on the US Militaria Forum, which has scores of active members and that atmosphere is cordial. Anyone can read their posts (guest can browse free, unlike most forums), and I feel that beginners can ask questions with confidence to tap into the expertise of lifelong and wizened collectors all over the world (literally). The
Preservation sub-forum sees updates frequently and has several topics pinned. I was led to a pasted article from the Kent State Museum, which I Googled and found the
link. It contains tips on handling, stabilizing, and storing artifacts.
At this point, I have decided to return to my original questions to see if I can narrow down my research:
* What is the best method of display or storage to protect against these elements? Storage and display are both important and I feel I can adequately address them. Protection against "the elements" is a common need of both displayed and stored items. I need to identify which elements I am going to protect against.
* Do I need climate control assets? What climates are the most destructive? This can be combined with the question above. I am going to try and find out the best range of climates (temperature, light, humidity) for items to be stored and displayed at. With this information, I should then measure the current climates and determine if changes need to be made.
* Should items be cleaned or treated, and how would this affect their longevity and value? The immediate answer is that it varies from collector to collector. Each has his/her preferences for collecting mint, worn, or relic items. In a market where values are determined by scarcity and how much others are willing to pay, the latter factor is variable from collector to collector. Thus, I am not going to answer the second part of this question.
* Why is collection documentation important, and how can it be used practically? I think that documentation is important in charting deterioration. This is the best relation to my topic I can make with this question, but it will not be my primary focus.
* How can I best share my findings to educate other collectors? This will address the "Waving" part!
* What can be feasibly accomplished on a small budget?Ooooooh yes. Once I have the information I am seeking, I can begin to assess what, if any, changes need to be made to my collection at present. Then I can identify budget-friendly ways to go about preserving my items.